I have been doing infrared photography for a while, which started with a Canon G7 point-and-shoot converted for this purpose. With that camera, I took a series of photographs from the window of commercial flights between Providence and Salt Lake City over four years. Eventually, that collection, Infrared Earthscapes, got published in the LensWork Magazine in December 2011.
Previous Infrared Cameras
Just a little before the publication of my Infrared Earthscapes collection, I replaced my infrared camera with a Canon Rebel T2i so that I could use different lenses on it, and that camera gave me many photographs until late last year. My main challenges with the first one were the small image size and the lack of raw format images. The second one produced a different challenge, this time with the focusing process. DSLR cameras use a secondary light path for focusing unless the live view is used. That proved to be difficult to use most of the time because the live view is very difficult to see outdoors, let alone carefully focus.
Mirrorless Cameras Have Infrared Advantages
I decided to replace my last infrared camera with a mirrorless one since the focus is always done on the actual image capturing sensor and is as precise as it needs to be. The logical choice for me was a Canon M5 since I had been using one since its introduction. I found a refurbished unit in the Canon store at a good price and purchased it a couple of months ago.
I had the other two cameras converted to infrared at LifePixel and was generally satisfied with the results. So, I decided to use their services again. An unfortunate mistake on their part, the battery lid required excessive force to open and close, caused me to send the camera back for service. They found that one screw was loose! I am not sure how, but they left it not properly tightened. So, the second service was easy but cost me $60 extra in shipping charges. Now, all is good.
(Note on 5/25/2018: I guess LifePixel was expecting me not to mention this snafu on their site, they strangely refunded $5 to me, probably triggered by my review in which I mentioned the extra shipping cost. Petty! And, I no longer have faith in their work or judgment.)
(Note on 5/28/2018: The principal of LifePixel contacted me via e-mail to set up a phone appointment, which we did. Due to some personal reasons, he missed it twice, and on the third time, he offered his apologies for not handling the matter better. I told him that I was not asking for a refund but simply narrating the story with an ending “Now, all is good.” He also told me that they refunded my extra shipping cost of $60 as a gesture of goodwill. Had they not made that $5 refund, all would still be good. I accepted his apology, goodwill will take time. I have donated the $60 to RI Center for Photographic Arts.)
Lightroom Has Become More Infrared Friendly
I have been trying to take some experimental photographs since I got the camera back as the weather and my health permitted. In the meantime, the new release of the Lightroom Classic CC and Adobe Camera Raw added features that made processing infrared images a lot easier than before, as I wrote in a recent post. Here, I am sharing some photographs that I took back in March in Roger Williams Park and this afternoon at the Garden City Shopping Center. I thank the staff of the Pottery Barn store for their cooperation and for allowing me to photograph in their store.
Sample Photographs
You will find a mix of photographs in terms of subject matter and processing. Take them as a result of my experiments in infrared photography. Keep in mind that even when the photograph appears in color and some parts may even look normal, they are false colors. That’s the nature of infrared photography!
Haluk Atamal
Interesting but not all are to my taste.
Thanks for sharing, Cemal!
Cemal Ekin
Haluk, infrared photography can be quite strange especially in the experimental mode. These are mainly concept testing in processing. My preferred processing for IR is typically B&W, the color renderings here are the result of playing around. Thanks for stopping by.
Cemal
Doug England
Hi Cemal,
I’m interested in your experience with and comments on using the EOS M5 for infrared photography.
I have an original EOS M converted by Kolari to Dual-Spectrum and use lens filters (590nm, 850nm on EF-M lenses 18-55, 11-22 and 22 mm). A converted mirrorless camera certainly has advantages in IR photography. I’m considering converting my EOS M5 (once the MKII is released) as I like the form factor and ergonomics better than the EOS M.
Thanks!
A. Cemal Ekin
Hello Doug,
I have had very good results with the M5 converted to infrared. I decided not to use additional filters and had it converted to standard IR. You are right about the form factor, it is very convenient and the image quality is very good. I rarely pull out my 5DM4. I have two M5 bodies, one for IR one for normal. I like the lens quality as well, 18-150 mm is my carry on lens. I also have 15-45, 28 mm macro, 55-200, and 22 mm. They all produce very good results for me. There are four more IR posts after this, you can see the photographs from the M5 on them:
https://www.keptlight.com/category/infrared/
BTW, thanks for the link to my channel swapping post.
Take care,
Cemal