I
have written about the model photographs with electroluminescent skin with razor sharp eyes and eyelashes and made a presentation (Part 1, Part 2, Part 3) on how to edit portraits for pleasing and plausible results. I have also challenged PSA to be more diligent on what they promote, implicitly or explicitly. Poor technique, when accepted by a large number of people can give the illusion of being right, or being a new “trend”. However, a close inspection of the photographs and what the master portrait editors, like David Cuerdon, do to edit their model photographs will make it abundantly clear that texture-free skin is a fallacy. Like its logical cousin, it may actually appear quite logical or acceptable in the absence of sound foundation logic, or sound photo editing workflow. One has to apply clear reasoning to avoid falling victim to fallacies, and use better tools to yield better photographs. To see some samples of this sort of portrait editing see the PSA exhibition acceptances, medal winners this year, last year, and quite likely next year. [Read more...]
The Soft-Focus Effect
MagCloud Update
A while back I wrote a two-part article (Part 1, Part 2) about a recommended workflow for publishing with MagCloud which has received favorable feedback from both MagCloud and other readers. In those posts I mentioned that MagCloud used two different profiles for saddle-stitched and perfect-bound magazines and suggested that I would most likely stick with the perfect-bound option. I have been recently informed that MagCloud now uses a unified profile for both binding options which should make life a lot easier for all the publishers using their services.
The new soft-proofing profile is available for download. After downloading it, you should go back to the original articles and replace the references to the profiles with this one. The earlier articles did not include links to any profile but MagCloud had allowed me to share them with anyone who wanted to use them. This should make the series of articles on this subject more complete and useful.
Lightroom Adjustments: Exposure vs Brightness
After further studying the behavior of the exposure and brightness sliders and discovering how strong upward exposure adjustments can cause serious color shift, I am modifying my workflow as shown below. Instead of relying mostly on exposure adjustment I am beginning to think that brightness adjustment is a more stable tool. On a photograph +2 exposure or +150 brightness produce almost identical results the latter being slightly more restrained. Ideally, this much adjustment should not be necessary, but in a pinch try the brightness firs. Now I understand better why Lightroom “Auto” tonal adjustment almost always uses the brightness slider.
I have been using Lightroom since its original public beta before version 1 was released. It has become an indispensable tool in my workflow like many other photographers. It offers a very good set of tools for photographers in a very usable interface. Those of you who go back that far may remember another product before Lightroom was even announced, Raw Shooter Essentials and Professional. The Essential was free and the Professional was worth every penny I paid for it. Adobe thought likewise and purchased the company and its technology along with it. Several tools in Lightroom, later in Photoshop are descendent of Raw Shooter series. The most notable ones that are visible outside are Recovery, Fill Light, Vibrance, and Clarity sliders. Along with these, I would not be a bit surprised if the entire “Basic” group is a descendent of RSE including brightness, blacks, and exposure. Interestingly, I have found the information on the “basic” group the most spotty and “soft” in presentation and explanation. Generally, explanations go like this “brightness is kind of exposure control but leaves the end points alone”, “it is a kinder and gentler exposure slider”, and so on. There are many discussions on variety of forums and you will read a variant of these explanations peppered on the Internet. Even Martin Evening in his quite encyclopedic volume on Lightroom does not provide a fully satisfying explanation of how the Exposure slider adjustment differs from the Brightness slider adjustment.
To better understand the behavior of these sliders, which seem to do very similar but not identical things, I decided to study their behavior on an artificial gray-scale ramp. In Photoshop, I created a 1200×1200 blank image and filled it from left to right with a gradient map going from black to white. To make reading values more consistent, I posterized the gradient fill with 16 steps. After importing the PSD file in to Lightroom, I took RGB readings from each strip and recorded them on each strip in Photoshop. The resulting file had the steps all identified as Lightroom saw the RGB values. Since they were all identical, I did not repeat the numbers for R, G, and B channels. [Read more...]
Photoshop Lightroom Resources
Photoshop Lightroom has become a very powerful, almost indispensable tool in photographers’ workflow; and for good reasons. It provides an environment for digital asset management, image editing, and output creation. It has easy to use tools for totally nondestructive editing at speeds that far exceed that of Photoshop’s in many, if not most cases. I now do most of my photo editing and outputting in Lightroom, pushing the photograph to Photoshop only when Lightroom falls short for some editing I need to do on an image. Even then, the round trip to Photoshop and back is only for that specific function. I like it!
Photographers and programmers have been trying to expand the capabilities of Lightroom by developing plug-in modules for it to perform functions that are not available in the core program. I will share several with you in this post. What you will read in this post will be the tip of the iceberg as there are many more such add-on modules, I will only share those that provide functions that I consider of use. Furthermore, this review excludes paid plugins from vendors like onOne, Nik, SlideShow Pro, and others. What you will find here are plugins that are free to try, and donate to own. The developers put many hours to developing these programs and deserve to be compensated no matter how small or large you decide to donate. [Read more...]
Layers for Lightroom
Lightroom has become a very mature product offering easy and powerful workflow for photographers. I now do much of image processing in Lightroom pushing the image to Photoshop for features that are not available in Lightroom. One of the tools that I often miss in Lightroom is the ability to use layers, blending modes, and masking. Although Lightroom offers some local adjustment tools, like gradient fill and local brush tool, they are no substitutes for layers-based adjustments.
Apparently others missed the same capability that onOne software collaborated with Scott Kelby to develop a tool called Perfect Layers. It is not available yet, but you can download a public preview from onOne software Web site and give that a try, it works with Lightroom or Aperture. I downloaded and experimented with the software. It works as intended, and for many users it may mean less need for Photoshop and money saved from that. As a Photoshop user, I did not see much benefit in Perfect Layers as [Read more...]
Flora
Infrared Earthscapes
Junk Yard